It's free, just sign up on the Free plan to continue.
No credit card required. Just verify your email.
Explore the November 2024 farmers' protest, highlighting key threats to UK farming and the urgent call for fair, sustainable policies.
London’s November 2024 farmers' protest was a striking moment of solidarity and frustration, as hundreds of farmers and their supporters took to the streets to demand action on policies threatening their livelihoods and the countryside. Against a backdrop of placards and chants, the marchers laid bare their concerns: a future where family-run farms are dismantled, food security compromised, and rural heritage at risk.
The AskGrant team was on the ground, engaging directly with protesters to hear their stories firsthand. From the devastating impact of inheritance tax reforms to the fight against corporate land grabs, this article highlights six critical issues voiced by farmers and their plea for fair and sustainable policies.
At the heart of their call was a simple but urgent message: the survival of farming in the UK requires addressing these key challenges through collaboration and action. With insights gathered directly from the farmers, this article offers a comprehensive look at the real stakes behind Britain’s agricultural crisis.
The centerpiece of the protest was the proposed 20% inheritance tax, which farmers believe unfairly targets family-run farms. For many, passing down land isn’t just about economics; it’s about legacy, continuity, and identity. These farms have been lovingly maintained over generations, embodying a commitment to community and the land.
But with the new tax reforms, many fear that heritage will be dismantled. “The government seems to think we’re sitting on piles of cash, but that’s not the reality,” said one protester. “Our assets are in the land and livestock, not in the bank. Paying a tax like this could mean selling parts of the farm just to keep the rest running.”
Farmers explained that this isn’t just a financial blow—it’s a structural one. Selling even a portion of a farm to meet tax obligations risks disrupting the delicate ecosystem of rural life, from food production to local economies. “When you break up a farm, you’re not just taking away land—you’re taking away generations of work and the backbone of the countryside,” added another participant.
Another dominant concern was the rising cost of farmland, driven in part by corporations purchasing vast swathes of land for carbon offsetting tree plantations. While such initiatives might sound environmentally friendly, farmers argue that they often displace sustainable, diversified farming operations.
“The government calls this a climate solution, but it’s pushing real farmers out of the market,” explained a young farmer. “These companies plant trees and leave. They don’t manage the land the way we do—to support ecosystems, wildlife, and food production.”
Farmers emphasized that the land they manage serves multiple purposes: feeding the nation, preserving biodiversity, and storing carbon. Unlike corporate plantations, which often result in monoculture, family-run farms sustain both the environment and rural communities.
“Tree planting is important,” said one farmer, “but it must be done with farming in mind, not against it. We need policies that integrate these goals, not pit them against each other.”
For decades, agricultural subsidies have acted as a safety net for farmers, providing much-needed stability amid fluctuating markets and rising costs. But as subsidies shrink and grants become harder to access, farmers fear they’re being left without support.
“Subsidies aren’t charity,” explained one farmer. “They’re investments in the UK’s food security. Without them, it’s impossible for small farms to compete with cheap imports and rising production costs.”
Tenant farmers are particularly vulnerable, relying heavily on subsidies to cover operational costs and implement sustainable practices. The erosion of this support is forcing many to question whether they can continue.
“Every penny we lose in grants is one less we can spend on wages, equipment, or adopting greener methods,” another protester shared. “Without help, farms like mine won’t survive.”
The cascading effects of farm closures don’t stop at the gates. Farmers warned that as domestic production decreases, the UK will become increasingly reliant on imports, driving up food costs and exposing the nation to global supply chain disruptions.
“If we lose our farms, shelves won’t be empty, but the prices will be sky-high,” explained one protester. “Imported food isn’t a solution—it comes with hidden costs like carbon emissions, lower standards, and reduced security.”
The pandemic was a harsh reminder of how vulnerable international supply chains can be. Farmers at the protest argued that investing in domestic agriculture isn’t just about food—it’s about resilience.
“Food security should be treated with the same importance as national defense,” one farmer said. “Without it, we’re gambling with the future.”
While the protest largely centered on financial and policy issues, many farmers spoke about the lack of public understanding regarding their broader contributions. Farmers don’t just grow food—they care for the land, protect wildlife, and provide vital community services like managing flood risks and clearing roads in winter.
“People don’t see the full picture,” said one participant. “Farmers are the backbone of the countryside, but we’re often treated as an afterthought.”
The potential loss of farms isn’t just an economic concern; it’s a cultural one. The landscapes cherished by Britons—hedgerows, wildflower meadows, and rolling fields—are actively maintained by farmers. Without them, the countryside as we know it could fade away.
The protest wasn’t just about frustration; it was a call for collaboration. Farmers urged the government to engage with them directly, to revisit policies like the inheritance tax, and to design long-term strategies that support both sustainability and food production.
“Don’t go to war with the countryside,” was a phrase echoed by many. Farmers emphasized that they’re not opposed to change—but they need that change to be fair and practical.
“We’re ready to work with the government to find solutions,” said one protester. “But we need them to see us as partners, not obstacles.”
The November 2024 protest was more than just a cry for help—it was a testament to the resilience of Britain’s farming community. At its core was a shared belief: farming is essential, not just for food but for the environment, the economy, and the nation’s identity.
As one farmer put it, “We’re not just fighting for ourselves—we’re fighting for everyone. For your food, for your countryside, for your future.”
Explore the November 2024 farmers' protest, highlighting key threats to UK farming and the urgent call for fair, sustainable policies.
London’s November 2024 farmers' protest was a striking moment of solidarity and frustration, as hundreds of farmers and their supporters took to the streets to demand action on policies threatening their livelihoods and the countryside. Against a backdrop of placards and chants, the marchers laid bare their concerns: a future where family-run farms are dismantled, food security compromised, and rural heritage at risk.
The AskGrant team was on the ground, engaging directly with protesters to hear their stories firsthand. From the devastating impact of inheritance tax reforms to the fight against corporate land grabs, this article highlights six critical issues voiced by farmers and their plea for fair and sustainable policies.
At the heart of their call was a simple but urgent message: the survival of farming in the UK requires addressing these key challenges through collaboration and action. With insights gathered directly from the farmers, this article offers a comprehensive look at the real stakes behind Britain’s agricultural crisis.
The centerpiece of the protest was the proposed 20% inheritance tax, which farmers believe unfairly targets family-run farms. For many, passing down land isn’t just about economics; it’s about legacy, continuity, and identity. These farms have been lovingly maintained over generations, embodying a commitment to community and the land.
But with the new tax reforms, many fear that heritage will be dismantled. “The government seems to think we’re sitting on piles of cash, but that’s not the reality,” said one protester. “Our assets are in the land and livestock, not in the bank. Paying a tax like this could mean selling parts of the farm just to keep the rest running.”
Farmers explained that this isn’t just a financial blow—it’s a structural one. Selling even a portion of a farm to meet tax obligations risks disrupting the delicate ecosystem of rural life, from food production to local economies. “When you break up a farm, you’re not just taking away land—you’re taking away generations of work and the backbone of the countryside,” added another participant.
Another dominant concern was the rising cost of farmland, driven in part by corporations purchasing vast swathes of land for carbon offsetting tree plantations. While such initiatives might sound environmentally friendly, farmers argue that they often displace sustainable, diversified farming operations.
“The government calls this a climate solution, but it’s pushing real farmers out of the market,” explained a young farmer. “These companies plant trees and leave. They don’t manage the land the way we do—to support ecosystems, wildlife, and food production.”
Farmers emphasized that the land they manage serves multiple purposes: feeding the nation, preserving biodiversity, and storing carbon. Unlike corporate plantations, which often result in monoculture, family-run farms sustain both the environment and rural communities.
“Tree planting is important,” said one farmer, “but it must be done with farming in mind, not against it. We need policies that integrate these goals, not pit them against each other.”
For decades, agricultural subsidies have acted as a safety net for farmers, providing much-needed stability amid fluctuating markets and rising costs. But as subsidies shrink and grants become harder to access, farmers fear they’re being left without support.
“Subsidies aren’t charity,” explained one farmer. “They’re investments in the UK’s food security. Without them, it’s impossible for small farms to compete with cheap imports and rising production costs.”
Tenant farmers are particularly vulnerable, relying heavily on subsidies to cover operational costs and implement sustainable practices. The erosion of this support is forcing many to question whether they can continue.
“Every penny we lose in grants is one less we can spend on wages, equipment, or adopting greener methods,” another protester shared. “Without help, farms like mine won’t survive.”
The cascading effects of farm closures don’t stop at the gates. Farmers warned that as domestic production decreases, the UK will become increasingly reliant on imports, driving up food costs and exposing the nation to global supply chain disruptions.
“If we lose our farms, shelves won’t be empty, but the prices will be sky-high,” explained one protester. “Imported food isn’t a solution—it comes with hidden costs like carbon emissions, lower standards, and reduced security.”
The pandemic was a harsh reminder of how vulnerable international supply chains can be. Farmers at the protest argued that investing in domestic agriculture isn’t just about food—it’s about resilience.
“Food security should be treated with the same importance as national defense,” one farmer said. “Without it, we’re gambling with the future.”
While the protest largely centered on financial and policy issues, many farmers spoke about the lack of public understanding regarding their broader contributions. Farmers don’t just grow food—they care for the land, protect wildlife, and provide vital community services like managing flood risks and clearing roads in winter.
“People don’t see the full picture,” said one participant. “Farmers are the backbone of the countryside, but we’re often treated as an afterthought.”
The potential loss of farms isn’t just an economic concern; it’s a cultural one. The landscapes cherished by Britons—hedgerows, wildflower meadows, and rolling fields—are actively maintained by farmers. Without them, the countryside as we know it could fade away.
The protest wasn’t just about frustration; it was a call for collaboration. Farmers urged the government to engage with them directly, to revisit policies like the inheritance tax, and to design long-term strategies that support both sustainability and food production.
“Don’t go to war with the countryside,” was a phrase echoed by many. Farmers emphasized that they’re not opposed to change—but they need that change to be fair and practical.
“We’re ready to work with the government to find solutions,” said one protester. “But we need them to see us as partners, not obstacles.”
The November 2024 protest was more than just a cry for help—it was a testament to the resilience of Britain’s farming community. At its core was a shared belief: farming is essential, not just for food but for the environment, the economy, and the nation’s identity.
As one farmer put it, “We’re not just fighting for ourselves—we’re fighting for everyone. For your food, for your countryside, for your future.”
.svg)
